[Most Recent Entries]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in
[ << Previous 20 ]
[ << Previous 20 ]
|Tuesday, August 16th, 2016|
|Wednesday, August 3rd, 2016|
|Gray Rabbit press release
Victoria Woodhull: Thinking Today's Thoughts 150 Years Ago
With all the hoopla surrounding Hillary Clinton's historic nomination for the Presidency of the United States, it's important to remember that her "first" comes with a caveat: she's the first female nominee for President from one of the two major parties
. But long before she broke that glass ceiling, Victoria Claflin Woodhull broke the gender barrier. In 1872—75 years before Hillary Clinton was born—Victoria Woodhull won the nomination of the Equal Rights Party (who also nominated Frederick Douglass for Vice President). She came to national prominence through a series of lectures and writings on the United States government: what it was and what she believed it ought to be. She collected much of that thinking into the volume The Origins, Tendencies and Principles of Government
And while she was waging her unsuccessful campaign for the Presidency, she was also part of the growing movement for female suffrage, which culminated in the adoption of the 19th Amendment in 1920. She was also a proponent of Free Love, freedom for women to choose how and with whom they'd live their lives, and even topics that were radical at the time, and today are simply expressions of equality.
In this newest year of the woman, Gray Rabbit Publications is proud to be publishing two volumes of Victoria Woodhull's ideas.The Origins, Tendencies and Principles of Government
(266 pages, $8.99, trade paperback, ISBN: 978-1-5154-0047-9) is the original text published by Woodhull's own firm in 1871.Victoria C. Woodhull: Ideas Ahead of Her Time
(210 pages, $7.99, trade paperback, ISBN: 978-1-5154-0046-8) is a collection of essays on suffrage, government and society, collected together for the first time. Contents include: "A New Constitution for the United States of the World," "The Memorial of Victoria C. Woodhull to Congress," "Constitutional Equality," "A Lecture on Constitutional Equality," "Children—Their Rights and Privileges," "And The Truth Shall Make You Free," "The Elixir of Life, or, Why Do We Die?" and "The Garden of Eden, or, The Paradise Lost & Found."
Both books are available through all major online retailers, and to physical bookstores via special order through Ingram, which is the distributor of all Gray Rabbit titles.
|Tuesday, July 26th, 2016|
This time, I wasn't surprised by an unexpected advance copy of the book. Rather, I'd ordered some copies to have them here for a launch party I'm hosting. So when the box showed up, with the side labeled in large letters "RANKING THE VICE PRESIDENTS", I pretty much knew what was going to be inside. Nevertheless, I'm very excited to announce the arrival of my newest book (official -publication date is still August 16th)!
|Saturday, July 23rd, 2016|
|Monday, July 18th, 2016|
|A three-way race is possible and potentially interesting
Data point: CNN’s latest poll says “In a four-way matchup between [Democrat Hillary] Clinton, [Republican Donald] Trump, [Libertarian Gary] Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton carries 42%, Trump 37%, Johnson 13% and Stein 5%.” [See this article
Data point: The Washington Post reports that “Both candidates remain highly unpopular — the two most unpopular in the history of Post-ABC polling. By about 2 to 1 (64 percent to 31 percent), Americans view Trump unfavorably. Clinton’s numbers are not quite as negative — 42 percent favorable and 54 percent unfavorable. Half of all registered voters say they have strongly unfavorable views of Trump, while 47 percent say they have strongly unfavorable views of Clinton — the highest ever in a Post-ABC poll for her.” [See this article
Data point: The Commission on Presidential Debate says that to be invited to participate in a debate, a candidate must be polling at 15% or more. [See this page
Combine those data points, and I’ve decided to urge everyone, if you are included in a political opinion poll, to tell the pollster you support Gary Johnson. I’m not asking you to change your vote (if you’ve already decided who you’re supporting, and apparently 80% of the electorate has already made that decision), and I’m not asking you to vote for any candidate. But I think the debates would be fascinating, and the campaign would be much more interesting than the current cesspool we’re wading through, if it did start to look like a three-way race.
|Tuesday, July 5th, 2016|
|Tuesday, June 21st, 2016|
A FedEx truck just showed up with an unexpected box: author copies of Ranking the First Ladies
. So that one which showed up by itself isn't a fluke: the book really does exist!
|Tuesday, June 14th, 2016|
|Monday, June 6th, 2016|
Today's mail brought a wonderful surprise, completely unexpected: an advance copy of Ranking the First Ladies
! Publication date is July 5th, but now I can hold my first hard cover book in my hot little hands!
|Thursday, May 19th, 2016|
Just got confirmation that I will be speaking at American Mensa
's Annual Gathering
this summer in San Diego, California. My talk will be Sunday, July 3rd, at 12noon. Titled "Hail to the Chiefs! (And their Vice Presidents, and First Ladies…)", you can probably guess what I'll be talking about. July 3rd is the final day of the AG, and while noon is not the final programming slot, it's pretty darn close, so I'll be hoping to grab enough people who are staying to the bitter end to make sure the audience isn't depressingly small. On the up-side, I'm hoping to have finished copies of Ranking the First Ladies
with me at the talk (the official publication date is July 5th); I don't think I'll have copies of Ranking the Vice Presidents
(the publication date of which is early August).
|Wednesday, May 4th, 2016|
|Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016|
|Monday, May 2nd, 2016|
|Recommending Allen Steele's Arkwright
I just finished reading Allen Steele's novel Arkwright
(which I didn't publish, but I won't hold that against him). For a space-exploration nut like me, it's kind of depressing, because his theorizing of what's to come is probably spot on. On the other hand, he does present a plausible method for getting humanity out into the cosmos. He grabbed me early in the book with his scenes set at the 1939 WorldCon; a feeling of nostalgia and loss, because I met a few of those people much later in their lives, and now they're gone, so seeing them much younger was nice. There's also a good homage to Isaac Asimov's Foundation
series (you don't have to have read Foundation
, but it feels good if you have). Anyway, overall, a very good book: recommended.
And if, after reading it, you start scanning the heavens looking for Eos, try this article
|Wednesday, April 27th, 2016|
|Ted Cruz picks Carly Fiorina: good move?
Did Ted Cruz just guarantee himself a trip to an open convention, in exchange for giving away the bargaining chip that might get him the nomination?
I listened to Ted Cruz's announcement today, that he has chosen a Vice Presidential running mate (something that isn't normally done for the primaries, but what the heck, it's a strange election this go-round).
Then I listened to Carly Fiorina's speech accepting the role. Not bad. Not great, but not bad. But I think they're positioning her improperly at this point. One thing that caught my ear was her comment about how wealthy Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are out of touch with the real people like you and me, because she included herself in that "non-wealthy" group. Sure, a net worth of $60 million is out of Trump's league (and probably Clinton's), but it is far and above the average American. It would have been much better, I think, if she'd positioned herself as a business executive with skills equal to Trump's, that would have changed his uniqueness (business acumen among a field of politicians) into just a feature that was shared with another ticket. Her presence on the ticket does remove Clinton's uniqueness as the only woman in the field.
I also listened to some of the post-announcement commentary. "Why did he make this announcement?" "Why did he pick her?" "Did they do a good job on stage?" It got very tedious, very quickly.
Why did he pick her? To remind people that he's still running, to draw media attention away from the front-runners, to try to cut into Hillary Clinton's seeming lock on the female vote due to the fact that she is female, to help him in the upcoming California primary. Actually, that last one is probably the biggest, because he knows there's a chance Trump can win the nomination before the convention, in which case he's done. But if Cruz can win California, the race may just continue all the way to the convention. And he needs to get to the convention if he wants any chance of winning the nomination. But this particular decision, at this point, if he gets his immediate goal (an open convention) may come back to bite him at the convention: he's just given away a major bargaining chip. He can't offer anybody the Vice Presidency in exchange for getting the nomination. Fiorina may be a good Vice Presidential running mate, but she can't give him anything to get the nomination except, maybe, her California roots.
We now return you to the horse-race journalism we've been suffering through during this year's primary season (of which, I admit, this commentary is a part).
|Tuesday, April 26th, 2016|
|The Hugo Awards: they've done it again
Last year, I posted this commentary on the Hugos
(reprinted below, to go with this new thought). This year, as the new ballot has been released and once again the "true Hugo fans" are up in arms over the results, it occurs that if the anti-puppy people ever do get their acts together sufficiently to form their own party to "take back" the Hugo Awards, it will most probably result in the pre-nomination balloting we in the US are currently experiencing: primary season. Gosh, won't that be fun.
|Friday, April 15th, 2016|
|Touching guns makes one evil?
Just now on CNN, the current "issue" was that in last night's Democratic debate, once again, Bernie Sanders said gun manufacturers and gun dealers -- who follow the laws and sell guns legally -- should not be open to lawsuits when guns are used to kill people. CNN had an outraged family member shocked that he could possibly believe this.
The part that surprises me the most is that Sanders hasn't said "Wait a minute. The law says it is legal to make and sell these things under certain circumstances. Why should the manufacturers or retailers be liable if they've adhered to the law? Why should they be liable if a legal customer then misused their product? When a car crash injures someone, the victim's family doesn't (and shouldn't be able to) sue the car dealer that sold the car, or the auto manufacturer. Why is it only guns?" Consider the recent spate of "slashings" in New York City: none of these victims are going to bring suit against the knife manufacturers, or the stores that sold those knives. Only guns.
|Friday, April 1st, 2016|
|Sunday, February 14th, 2016|
|Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016|